sparked my curiosity, cuz i have been taking goljan's words as law, found a recent review on Helminths (march 2008)
Human Hookworm Infection in the 21st Century
"Eosinophilia, mastocytosis, and IgE stimulation are the three main immune alterations observed during a hookworm infection in humans. But the overall immune responses of human hosts to hookworm infection are remarkably similar to infections with other helminths: dominated by the production of T-helper-2 (Th2) cytokines interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-9, IL-10, and IL-13, which is consistent with the development of strong IgE, eosinophil, and mast cell responses mentioned above........A concomitant observation was the high level of IL-10 compared to other cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13) that accompany chronic hookworm infection and the decline that accompanies treatment..................These high levels of IL-10 observed in the sera and in vitro cultures with crude antigen extracts are thought to play a principal role in
minimizing what is effectively an immediate (type 1) hypersensitive (allergic) responses (Pritchard and Brown, 2001)." <------ HOWEVER this specific cited article is older than goljan's notes/rapid review book...dammit
its kinda long and boring article ... i would be interested in seeing the actual question from kaplan to see how they worded it .. the deciding factor i guess is if there's inflammation it would be type 1, but then again IL-10 is anti-inflammatory so then how could it be type 1... i assume the usmle people keep there info/questions up to date.... bleh..
anyone else have any idea? goljan vs kaplan!