Quote:
Originally Posted by wcb22
it seems very odd to me the 2 digit and 3 digit discrepancy here. a 228 usually would correlate to a 92 or 93. and the other poster got 226, and the 2 digit was a 90. these 2 digit and 3 digit should correlate better. something fishy going on.
|
I do not think there is anything "fishy" here, I do not know you, and you do not know me,but I studied a lot for my 90, I do not care is the 3 digit score and the 2 digit score correlates "for you".Nobody knows what is the exact correlation. Everybody in these forums just "elucubrates" about it and just drop irresponsible comments like yours. I do not care if you or others believe it or not, it is not important, your opinion does not make any difference to me. I just tried to help others to figured out , to have an idea,posting my score as well as the other members that posted theirs. Everyone of us knows perfectly how much study, endless hours, sacrifice, money, no weekends, no hollidays.......took to get the score that some of us dare to post in this forum, in a sincere and honest way, at least I did it that way. So nobody has the right to question it in any way. I think it is very disrespecful and low. Definitely it is NOT COOL.