
Originally Posted by
drvempire
hello, i wanted to know abt the new MD in clinical medicine program thats jus started by the university of buckingham, west london,its a post graduate masters degree in internal medicine. any extra info would be helpful.
It's a shame that you have duplicated this request for information as we now have a reprise of the original misunderstandings and ill-informed comment. (http://www.valuemd.com/uk-irish-medi...uckingham.html)

Originally Posted by
Back_To_School
This has come up before. This isn't a state medical school and there is no such qualification so it is completely worthless.
Please see my posts in the thread linked above. I'm sorry that you have chosen to ignore those comments which were largely based on simple, eminently verifiable facts which you've not actually controverted. As I elucidated previously, Buckingham's status as a private university has no bearing on its ability to award legitimate U.K. degrees or that these are "worthless".

Originally Posted by
Back_To_School
The UK awards the following medical degrees: MBBChir, BMBCh, MBBCh, MBChB, BMBS, and the MBBS. These are all exactly the same as each other and exactly the same as the American/European 'MD' but, in the UK they never, ever actually award an 'MD' as this is a completely different qualification over here as it is a post graduate research degree and of a higher level.
This is neither here nor there in a discussion of Buckingham's "MD in Clinical Medicine". This is an Indian-style MD: a post-grad. specialist (or semi-specialist) qualification that mixes theory and hands-on clinical experience.

Originally Posted by
Back_To_School
Any university that is based in the UK that claims to offer an 'MD' (the basic medical degree not the research one) is a scam as it will never be recognized by the GMC.
But this is not the "basic medical degree" - something about which both the OP and Bucks. University are very clear. The GMC simply does not concern itself with validation of post-grad. courses. As was explained before, the QAA, as the relevant body, will be quality- assuring: not the GMC's QABME which only has a remit to deal with undergraduate medical education.
They have rather cleverly decided to fill a gap in the medical education market that has been created by the new rules regarding both work permits and eligibility for post-graduate medical training here. Calling the degree an MD is, I am sure, designed to attract newly-qualified doctors from the Indian sub-continent for whom both the course title and content will have considerable resonance.
Calling the degree an MD may be novel, controversial and for some, unpalatable in the British context. However, it is simply a reflection of an increasingly internationalized market in all kinds of education, including medicine. Nth. Americans award an MD as basic qualification, we sometimes award it as an honorary degree to the "great and the good" in the bio-medical field regardless of whether they have ever wielded steth. or scalpel; the Indians do something else altogether. Bucks. may have added to the bewildering alphabet soup of medical qualifications and scope for cross-cultural misunderstanding- but "scam"? Any real evidence for that calumny?

Originally Posted by
BrendaB_MD
According to the
Buckingham discussion on Wiki, they have no medical school at present. As stated in the post above, the MD is only open to those who have already competed a medical degree. According to the discussion, it is not clear how the Buckingham version of MD will compare to the traditional research-based MD.
As usual with Wiki there is good, bad and dreadful here. The first couple of paragraphs are bizarrely irrelevant, inaccurate and rambling.
However, I do think that the later discussion of how this qualification might actually further anyone's career is useful, albeit a little chaotic and unclear at times. Some of this was astutely mentioned by Osiris in the original thread.
I hope by now it will be a little clearer that the Bucks' MD is not competing with, and should not be compared to "the traditional research-based MD".
The real issue is will it compare with those Indian MD's as a post-graduate stepping stone to higher things.
They do have a fledgling school - albeit one that until 2010 is solely post-graduate.
So, to drvempire:
I don't know where you intend to practise and thus some of my comments may not hit the spot. However I'll try.
I hope it's now plain that the course is not a "scam" and is as you originally asked "legit". The academic and clinical bodies and personnel involved are certainly reputable.
If you're looking to advance your career in Sth. Asia then you need to be clear about recognition of the 2-year degree there and comparisons with (3-year?) local MD's.
I know that the school has posted a link to an Indian High Commision announcement concerning recognition. However it does not mention Bucks. specifically and does state that "that these degrees should be recognized in the respective country for enrolment of medical practitioners in the concerned specialties." -Press Release Details : HCI London
So check that one out if you need to.
It's been mentioned on the Wiki (and by Osiris) that this is not standard U.K. post-graduate medical education of the kind much sought-after and now largely denied to non-EU citizens. There are questions to be asked about exactly how much clinical experience you will get and whether the lack of ultimate clinical responsibility (assuming you are not on the GMC register) will really limit the benefits of the course. I feel that the Wiki comments on this are a little premature and may be overstated.
There are always legitimate concerns about clinical training: will it be well-organized; well-taught; have a sufficient patient-base?
Unfortunately these are questions which are not easily answered here and now on VMD. That's partly because VMD's basic constituency is not so much concerned with post-grad. medical courses, but mostly because this course is so new and such an unknown quantity.
I would suggest that apart from checking on overseas recognition (if you need to do so), you talk some more to the teachers about these issues of clinical exposure etc. in order to get a clearer idea of what you will get for your investment. These are legitimate and intelligent questions and no responsible clinician/academic should object or obfuscate - especially as this is a new school.
Would another possibility be to defer starting the course for a little while so that you can at least get some feedback from other students after they have been there for some months? Again, the course officials should not object to putting you in touch.
Anyone contemplating this course must also understand that it should not be regarded as a back door into U.K. medical employment - for the moment at least I cannot see that this degree on its own will achieve that for a non-EU citizen.
Last edited by diogenes; 09-02-2008 at 08:29 AM.
"Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better."
Samuel Beckett, "Worstward Ho", 1983