Originally Posted by IPY

For your info, here is what I have just found out.

Apparently, this whole situation with California and NJ was caused by "eager" students who decided to verify the validity of the GSP program on their own. This resulted in "poor" presentation of this program to the above two licensing boards; causing the Cali. board to initiate an investigation. SGU's original plan (as an extra preventative measure), I think, was to print transcripts to the GSPers as if they did their study in Grenada... Oh well.

NJ should be ok with 1 months or so.
California, however, will take some time.

Originally Posted by summerwind

I called the NJ Board in Trenton and was finally able to speak to a guy who said a number of SGU students have been calling. He told me there was no issue with the SGU GSP graduates being licensed in NJ. SGU has to include the particulars of the GSP program in the update that they file with the Board every two years. The GSP program is the same number of weeks and follows the same curriculum as in Grenada, therefore, it is acceptable.

Originally Posted by rokshana

probably the GSP transcripts would note that you are in the GSP somewhere on the transcript.

as for not mentioning 5/6th terms as being vinnies classes, well it is well documented that the 1st 4 terms of the MD program is in GND and the last terms (pre-clinical ones) are in Vinnies

actually its isn't documented that the post Ivan classes are held elsewhere (fla or ny)

actually i've never seen a documentation of WHERE a class is taken on ANY of my transcripts- just what institution they were taken with.

Originally Posted by Haterade

Right. I think it would be a lot of trouble to label every class with respect to a particular location. The whole transcript format would need to be changed! It is most likely, as rokshana suggests, that they will mention Global Scholar, GSP, ***** B. Taylor GSP, or something to that effect in the transcript header.