The court appointed receiver of the assets of SC have submitted a request to the court to order release of transcripts to former students. I have a copy of the report to the court and the proposed orders in my possession. Students can contact the attorney

Gibbons, Del Deo, Dolan, Griffinger & Vecchione

and request information. The proposal would require SCIMD to release transcripts to students within 10 days of a request at no charge.

azskeptic

__________________
Moderator - State Licensing Forum

Still skeptical after all these years.
This is it. There are no hidden meanings.WYSIWYG

http://www.internetmedicalschool.homestead.com

http://www.chiropractormds.homestead.com/index.html

Dear former St. Christopher College of Medicine Students and other interested parties:

Attached please find PDF copies of the submission that we made to Judge Malone regarding the St. Christopher's Receivership. We hope this resolves many of the questions that you may have regarding student files, transcripts and other related issues.

Best Regards,

Robert C. Brady, Esq.
Gibbons, Del Deo, Dolan, Griffinger & Vecchione, P.C.Proposed Case Mgmt. Order.pdf

Proposed Transcript Order.pdf

Letter to Judge Malonea.zip

I have all the reports (letter to Judge M, Proposed Transcript order, Proposed case mgmt, fee ap, and fee order). I find it very interesting that the financials state FS walked away with 1.6M, PL 900K, and TP 300K. I guess this answers the question of who took the money? I also have the documentation of returned funds leaving the final count at FS 1.6M, PL 600K, and TP 150K. Also on page 35 of the fee ap the receivers billed 1 hour on 1/8/07 for "conduct research re: IRS consent suspension of FS. In addition there are a total of 128 complaints against FS/SCIMD regarding transcripts and diplomas.

PS. Be careful I got 2 warnings for posting names which you did in your link.

Actually, there has been movement for a while now. Some students have already rec’d their transcripts without the help of an attorney. A couple have even posted here saying that they rec’d them. They just had to go through Senegal. The good news is the past issues are being resolved and the school is moving forward. It’s open, running smoothly and students are steadily moving towards graduation day. Everything you mentioned here, old admin included, is St. Chris’ past not its future.

__________________

reading the officer of the courts info one sees that not all are getting transcripts smoothly or the receiver of the school wouldn't be applying for a court order to be directed to the new entity SCIMD. I applaud that the courts are involved in sorting out this mess.

__________________
Moderator - State Licensing Forum

Still skeptical after all these years.
This is it. There are no hidden meanings.WYSIWYG

http://www.internetmedicalschool.homestead.com

http://www.chiropractormds.homestead.com/index.html

they are resolving past issues regarding former students who found themselves caught in the crossfire between St. Chris and the old admin. When the school split apart last year. Soap said he rec'd his within a few days by calling the old admin directly. The judge should question how the old admin was able to get him his transcript so quickly. None of this has any affect on current students.

__________________

So there is no confusion the SC school was owned by PL (60%) and FS(40%) according to this paperwork.

If I was a current student I think I'd be carefully investigating the research that the court receivers have put together. It speaks loudly of potential problems students can have from a school run by the previous management/ownership also.

__________________
Moderator - State Licensing Forum

Still skeptical after all these years.
This is it. There are no hidden meanings.WYSIWYG

http://www.internetmedicalschool.homestead.com

http://www.chiropractormds.homestead.com/index.html

what the old admin told me directly was that he was an er doc in florida, he was approached by a group from senegal and was one of 4 men who opened a med school in england...so this isn't true???

__________________

A very simple answer, I called the NJ number (still in operation) and spoke with SP. She told me 8 weeks to get a transcript. I then called PL and told him I would be dismissed if I had to wait 8 weeks. He called SP and had her issue my transcript by the end of the week. What I think you are looking for is that PL was still in possession of student files at that time and unlike FS or the Senegalese the office functioned at a much higher professional level.

I believe PL owned 40% and his X 20%. But given these percentiles don't you think it's evident that FS took the funds as documented by the letter to judge M?