Department for Education list - Page 5

stephew · #41 (**permalink**) 12-29-2006, 05:25 PM

I will repeat this one more time: please stop telling other users what to ; that is not the place of users on this forum. Further the determination of whether this or any other thread will be closed is not dependant upon az maknig any sort of statement, and is not dictated by how happy any given user is over the content. see tos for more.

Quote:

Originally Posted by empathy

There is no problem with the St. Chris listing. Please apologize so we can close this thread.

empathy · #42 (**permalink**) 12-29-2006, 05:31 PM

I was referring to his thread where he said the office wasn't opened, he'd look into it and if he was wrong he'd apologize. Please see locked thread.

empathy · #43 (**permalink**) 12-29-2006, 05:37 PM

it's right here and he didn't say he'd apologize but it only seems appropriate. And I didn't say 'again' to 'lock' the thread - I just wanted the issue closed i.e. resolved...this could start a horrible rumor which could have a negative impact on the school.

Quote:

Originally Posted by azskeptic

After the holiday we'll see what the Dept of Ed says. It is posted elsewhere that the school was removed and from the website I was accessing it appeared to be true. Not sure now. If I'm wrong I'll admit it. I have been accused of being wrong many times on this board and ultimatly was proven right by the govts actions and the results. Ask the students still fighting for their transcripts and money.

stephew · #44 (**permalink**) 12-29-2006, 06:03 PM

i have said this too many times. stop telling others what the content of their posts should and shouldnt be. if a user wishes to make a specific statement that is up to them. if they say they will and dont for whatever reason, that is up to them. you can feel any way you want about it, that's your perogative. and if you want the issue resolved, repeated posting keeping it alive is probably counter productive but again, its your perogative. however it is not appropraite to repeatedly dictate what sort of statement other users should be making you made your point more than once and that is sufficient.

empathy · #45 (**permalink**) 12-29-2006, 09:24 PM

Stephew, you and I seem to have bad chemistry. You've even posted something negative after my posts in the relaxing lounge. There are far worst posts here in this forum. Mine are pretty tame. You've said nothing publicly to anyone but me......Soap, Red or Pru might be a better focus. Perhaps you don't like the team I've chosen to support??? Whatever the case, stop trying to make it look like I'm a control freak. I'm right on this point. Az was out of line.

teratos · #46 (**permalink**) 12-29-2006, 09:31 PM

Empathy, what happens in public and what happens in private are 2 different things. Again, review the Terms of Service of the site. It is not the place of the moderators to judge content of post, only to make sure they follow the rules of the site.

rangness · #47 (**permalink**) 12-30-2006, 03:54 PM

are we stilll talking about DFES????

empathy · #48 (**permalink**) 12-30-2006, 04:21 PM

got off track. To sum it up I think one of Az's sources gave him some bad info regarding the dfes listing. The person responsible for the misinformation will not be back in the office until Jan. 9 so Az can't clear it up for us right now but he will.

stephew · #49 (**permalink**) 01-01-2007, 03:33 PM

and I will add that you are responsible for your own posts, not what other people said. if you want to report another post, you well know how to do it.

as far as what "team" you are on: couldnt care less. the mods enforce tos, and often only after many MANY courtsey notes to ask users to do what they already agreed to do when they signed up. Those are freebies that we, as volunteers, have offered you even though this is not required. Additionally, I (and probably all of the mods) simply don't care about the specific issues that are debated when we moderate. I know i dont have the time and frankly, I dont have the interest to keep track of what team someone is on or even how often they've switched sides. the mods are equal opportunity.

Quote:

Originally Posted by teratos

Empathy, what happens in public and what happens in private are 2 different things. Again, review the <a href=http://www.valuemd.com/disclaimer.php>Terms of Service</a> of the site. It is not the place of the moderators to judge content of post, only to make sure they follow the rules of the site.

empathy · #50 (**permalink**) 01-01-2007, 06:21 PM

ok, thank you.

Quote:

Originally Posted by stephew

and I will add that you are responsible for your own posts, not what other people said. if you want to report another post, you well know how to do it.

as far as what "team" you are on: couldnt care less. the mods enforce tos, and often only after many MANY courtsey notes to ask users to do what they already agreed to do when they signed up. Those are freebies that we, as volunteers, have offered you even though this is not required. Additionally, I (and probably all of the mods) simply don't care about the specific issues that are debated when we moderate. I know i dont have the time and frankly, I dont have the interest to keep track of what team someone is on or even how often they've switched sides. the mods are equal opportunity.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
CA's recognized medical school list is full of bias, errors, political agenda.	CaliforniaEquality	State Medical Licensing Information	258	03-09-2006 10:18 PM