Moderation situation of SC forum

[ValuelessMD]

..........

[sheikh1]

I am in favor of moderation!!!

[smoohead]

Take a look at the "What do MUAB students..." thread in the MUA-Belize forum. It has already started over there. Some people will start discord no matter what. And for no reason whatsoever! It's not the forum that needs moderation, it's certain users that need to be watched more closely.

[AUCMD2006]

Originally Posted by smoohead

Take a look at the "What do MUAB students..." thread in the MUA-Belize forum. It has already started over there. Some people will start discord no matter what. And for no reason whatsoever! It's not the forum that needs moderation, it's certain users that need to be watched more closely.

as long as there is no name calling, threats, etc these forums should stay true to their begining and that is free information. while some moderation is obviously needed to keep it degrading to a network54, "highly moderated" forums will likely just be conduits of propaganda depending on who is moderating.

these forums should stay open, specially the new schools because there really is no other place to get much of this information. would you rely solely on a website from a school any more than one run by that school's student governemnt or 'cheerleaders'? i wouldn't.

[microphage]

Originally Posted by The Trifling Jester

Kigezi has closed and still has its own forum on this website. What is the difference between Kigezi and St Chris, other than financial obligations?

-The Trifling Jester

I KNOW I KNOW!! BTS attended both schools.... (oh wait, u wanted differences)

[empathy]

this one too maybe? It's pretty old.

[Doc]

Originally Posted by empathy

this one too maybe? It's pretty old.

This forum is still under strict Moderation, so the info still applies.

[Azrealist]

Originally Posted by Doc

This forum is still under strict Moderation, so the info still applies.

strict moderation by who? and in what fashion?

there are no facts posted here... (ie there never was a factual relationship between SCIMD and MUA... PL tried to sell something that he wasn't authorized to do... yet people still bring this up as if it was an actual thing that happened)

old out of date links and topics are allowed to be rehashed..

no one with any medical school administration or state medical administrative knowledge is on here...

anytime anyone from the school come on here and actually posts facts.. the trolls come running and attack those people... thats why no one from the school posts here... i'm just here because it was getting rediculous on this site

do i really need to go on?

This forum is about the old school SCCM and the PL past... this entire forum should be lock or archieved as historical only... I'm not sure if you've actually read this forum.. but there has been a change in the school and its actually now call SCIMD...

nice job with the "strict" moderation...

[Doc]

Originally Posted by Azrealist

strict moderation by who? and in what fashion?

there are no facts posted here... (ie there never was a factual relationship between SCIMD and MUA... PL tried to sell something that he wasn't authorized to do... yet people still bring this up as if it was an actual thing that happened)

old out of date links and topics are allowed to be rehashed..

no one with any medical school administration or state medical administrative knowledge is on here...

anytime anyone from the school come on here and actually posts facts.. the trolls come running and attack those people... thats why no one from the school posts here... i'm just here because it was getting rediculous on this site

do i really need to go on?

This forum is about the old school SCCM and the PL past... this entire forum should be lock or archieved as historical only... I'm not sure if you've actually read this forum.. but there has been a change in the school and its actually now call SCIMD...

nice job with the "strict" moderation...

What is meant by "strict" moderation is that a lower tolerance will be given to violators of the Terms of Service. For example, in other forums, users are sometimes provided with a courtesy PM (not required) to edit their post in order to avoid receiving an infraction. However, in the SC forum, violations will likely result in infractions without the opportunity to edit first.

I think that you're misunderstanding the role of the Moderators. It is NOT the job of the Moderators to ensure the truthfulness of any particular post. The Mods don't care what is written, only how it is written (within the TOS). That is the main difference between censorship and moderation. This site is NOT censored, but it IS moderated.

In addition, the Mods are NOT responsible for monitoring every post on the site. Rather, the users can report any post which they believe is in violation of the TOS. The Moderators will then investigate the reports accordingly.

I hope that helps. But please let me know if you have any further questions.

[stephew]

i should add that all users agreed to the terms of use here. if they are unacceptable there are other unmoderated forums where no only is the content not moderatred, but the manners are not either.