Moderation situation of SC forum

[pruritis_ani]

And my point is that there is nothing on here libelous...if you think there is something that is libelous, that we are prefacing with "in my opinion", please show us.

[redeye]

Originally Posted by Genossa maximillian

It's getting juicy

Its actually kindof stupid.

Originally Posted by Genossa maximillian

Well, if clarifying such important topics as internet communication law is stupid, oh well! It's up to you.

It's not the topic, it's you statement that I was commenting on.

It still looks to me like your trying to scare people from posting.

[Genossa maximillian]

that's what you think, your opinion.

Cheers

Originally Posted by redeye

Its actually kindof stupid.




It's not the topic, it's you statement that I was commenting on.

It still looks to me like your trying to scare people from posting.

[Genossa maximillian]

Originally Posted by pruritis_ani

And my point is that there is nothing on here libelous...if you think there is something that is libelous, that we are prefacing with "in my opinion", please show us.

You will be surprised by how many of those you will find, not only in this forum, but the other one as well.

Keep searching, happy holidays........!

[diogenes]

I think it's obvious that G. Max. enjoys a legal debate and has little interest in scaring people. There are others though who have posted here in the last couple of days with what might well be considered scaremongering and whose motivation I can't figure out.

[empathy]

are just afraid the negative posters will read this, come to their senses and back off. It's true and makes perfect sense. Negative posts do open you up to liability.

Question is...why are you here? You've all said all you had to say and shared ALL the info you have about St. Chris NUMEROUS times. Now, you are just regurgitating the same stuff over and over again in an attempt to steer students away from the college. It's obvious that Az and Pru are here to warn students so they won't attend St. Chris. I know at least some of pru's posts have violated tos and he has yet to have rec'd a warning. It's the same negative info repeated time and time again...just in a dif manner.

Originally Posted by empathy

I asked a lawyer and here is his response. St. Chris does have grounds for a lawsuit against you, Az and especially Pru for the following: (Me too but I'm trying to make ammends.)

Defamation....In law, defamation is the communication of a statement
that makes an express or implied factual claim that may harm the
reputation of an individual, business, product, group, government or
nation. Most jurisdictions provide legal actions, civil and/or
criminal, to punish various kinds of defamation.

Libel (harmful statement in a fixed medium, especially writing but
also a picture, sign, or electronic
broadcast), each of which gives a common law right of action.

And first ammendment rights is not a defense for defamation or libel.

[stephew]

This will be closed for a cooling off period and reopened with the expectation that there will no intimidation between users against each other.