Thread: Hamas fires rockets into Israel despite cease fire agreement

Yahoo!

Tipton, what defense you offer for them? They already broke their own agreement. Of course if Israel attacks again, it is unjustified. Of course they want to use the cease fire to re-arm and start all over again, even a blind can see that.

I just posted a reply to him, too bad I won't see his answer. I will miss him, I have no ill towards him.

Originally Posted by gumby

I won't say I'll miss AKF

Originally Posted by gumby

By your own admission, Egypt had Gaza, not the Palestinians.

Egypt has possession of Gaza and administered it similar to Israel's control of Gaza until they withdrew, and to Israel's continued control of the WB. One big difference however would be Egypt did not then move Egyptian citizens in to "settle" there as Israeli's have done since 1967 in Gaza, WB adn the Golan.

Didn't they captured Gaza, WB and Golan Heights during the war? That could happen after a war.
Let's ask the USA to surrender some of its territories as well, not a bad idea, isn't it?

Originally Posted by Tipton

Egypt has possession of Gaza and administered it similar to Israel's control of Gaza until they withdrew, and to Israel's continued control of the WB. One big difference however would be Egypt did not then move Egyptian citizens in to "settle" there as Israeli's have done since 1967 in Gaza, WB adn the Golan.

Originally Posted by Genossa maximillian

Didn't they captured Gaza, WB and Golan Heights during the war? That could happen after a war.
Let's ask the USA to surrender some of its territories as well, not a bad idea, isn't it?

Yes. And sure why not? Colonialism or winning territory by war has been out of fashion for many years. Or why didn't we let Iraq keep Kuwait (as Saddam would have called in : the 17th? province of Iraq)?

In suing for peace with Egypt, Israel gave back the Sinai to Egypt and had to evacuate its Settlers there.

Why we didn't let Saddam keep Kuwait?

There was a LOT of oil involved.

Originally Posted by Tipton

Yes. And sure why not? Colonialism or winning territory by war has been out of fashion for many years. Or why didn't we let Iraq keep Kuwait (as Saddam would have called in : the 17th? province of Iraq)?

In suing for peace with Egypt, Israel gave back the Sinai to Egypt and had to evacuate its Settlers there.

Originally Posted by Genossa maximillian

Why we didn't let Saddam keep Kuwait?

There was a LOT of oil involved.

Oh yeah! I forgot about oil. What region of there world are we discussing?

Actually it's a pretty common Israeli complaint that "Israel isn't getting fair treatment" in the world since they are being criticized for activities that every other country in the world used toget away with: ethnic cleansing, colonialism, builiding settlements in military-occupied territory...etc. Poor Israel! If only they had established themselves 100 years earlier noone would complain about such things.

'Night all. This is going to be one hell of a week.

Yes, oil, the always valuable petrol.

Originally Posted by Tipton

Oh yeah! I forgot about oil. What region of there world are we discussing?

Actually it's a pretty common Israeli complaint that "Israel isn't getting fair treatment" in the world since they are being criticized for activities that every other country in the world used toget away with: ethnic cleansing, colonialism, builiding settlements in military-occupied territory...etc. Poor Israel! If only they had established themselves 100 years earlier noone would complain about such things.

Well let's debate this some more AKF......oh, you can't. You went and got yourself banned.

Bye now.