Home Forum Books Links Album Residency USMLE PreMed


Caribbean Medical Schools European Medical Schools Foreign Medical Schools Medical Resources
Go Back   ValueMD Medical Schools Forum > FUN AND FANTASY > The Relaxing Lounge

Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2008, 08:40 AM
flickingoffidioticdrivers's Avatar
Member Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Springfield, USA
Posts: 12,316
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
CNN: Sex takes 3 to 13 minutes, study says

A survey of sex therapists concluded the optimal amount of time for sexual intercourse was 3 to 13 minutes. The findings, to be published in the May issue of the Journal of Sexual Medicine, strike at the notion that endurance is the key to a great sex life.

Sex takes 3 to 13 minutes, study says - CNN.com
__________________
Posterior Fornix!

Me fail English? That's unpossible. - Ralph Wiggum
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2008, 09:37 AM
jaywalk81's Avatar
Useless Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: nyc
Posts: 17,391
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
Images: 1
are you jealous foid?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2008, 03:04 PM
coolaid's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,410
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
really? i thought it was between 45 mins and 'all night long', ask USHER!!!!!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2008, 03:21 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 101
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
Wow, I must be doing something wrong. I need to pick up the pace a little, haha.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2008, 03:56 PM
argazul's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,623
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
something wrong is better than nothing..haha
__________________

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2008, 05:27 PM
flickingoffidioticdrivers's Avatar
Member Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Springfield, USA
Posts: 12,316
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
"keep it on the hush 'cuz it ain't no rush" - ludacris
__________________
Posterior Fornix!

Me fail English? That's unpossible. - Ralph Wiggum
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2008, 07:21 PM
jaywalk81's Avatar
Useless Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: nyc
Posts: 17,391
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
Images: 1
i need more training....
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2008, 08:48 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wild west
Posts: 82
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Disclaimer: I talk pretty openly about a lot of issues, so if you are squeamish... then don't read this post....

It seems here that 'sexual intercourse' here is determined by how long it takes the male. (If that's the case, then this is pathetic.) If both partners were taken into consideration, I'm sure the time would be much higher. I'm not sure that most women would stick around in a relationship for 3 minute sex (and not get anything out of it themselves), unless they really didn't like their partners and just wanted to get the sex over with as soon as possible... or unless they were the submissive disempowered type who think is their wifely 'duty' to put out even if they don't get the same satisfaction. My guess is that the 8-13 minute segment may have considered women into the picture, but the 3 min certainly didn't.

It would be interesting if research also considered gays and lesbians... my guess is that it would be like:

M & M--> 1-3 min
F & F--> 8-25 min

Anyways, I wonder why this research was done in the first place. I'm not sure what the extrinsic value of such a study is.
__________________
Formerly known as "rkaz".

Last edited by multigrain23 : 04-03-2008 at 08:54 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2008, 09:00 PM
spyyder's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Level 10
Posts: 712
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by multigrain23 View Post
Disclaimer: I talk pretty openly about a lot of issues, so if you are squeamish... then don't read this post....

It seems here that 'sexual intercourse' here is determined by how long it takes the male. (If that's the case, then this is pathetic.) If both partners were taken into consideration, I'm sure the time would be much higher. I'm not sure that most women would stick around in a relationship for 3 minute sex (and not get anything out of it themselves), unless they really didn't like their partners and just wanted to get the sex over with as soon as possible... or unless they were the submissive disempowered type who think is their wifely 'duty' to put out even if they don't get the same satisfaction. My guess is that the 8-13 minute segment may have considered women into the picture, but the 3 min certainly didn't.

It would be interesting if research also considered gays and lesbians... my guess is that it would be like:

M & M--> 1-3 min
F & F--> 8-25 min

Anyways, I wonder why this research was done in the first place. I'm not sure what the extrinsic value of such a study is.
Sex and relationship quality are mutually exclusive items, why would you assume they are related. I thinks it speaks more about what you value than what people in general find important.
__________________
There is no chance, no fate, no destiny that can circumvent, or hinder, or control a firm resolve of a determined soul.

"I've got a degree in Homeopathic Medicine!....You've got a degree in baloney" -Futurama

"...you should take some echinacea, or St. John's Wort...Or a big fat placebo. It's all the same crap" -Futurama
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2008, 09:17 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wild west
Posts: 82
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyyder View Post
Sex and relationship quality are mutually exclusive items, why would you assume they are related. I thinks it speaks more about what you value than what people in general find important.
Ummm... I'm female. Physical intimacy and relationship quality are certainly linked, not mutually exclusive. I'm not stating that men don't value this, but I think this is the stereotype of women.
__________________
Formerly known as "rkaz".
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Phase II Study of Rabicabir in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Who Cannot Use Int Adrian Di Bisceglie Main Medical Marketplace 3 03-25-2008 05:19 PM
Doctors stretched thin in rural areas: study IMGCanada Canadian IMG 0 01-12-2006 08:25 AM
Study: Large vitamin E doses risky Siddman The Relaxing Lounge 3 03-16-2005 07:39 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2003-2008 ValueMD, LLC. All rights reserved.
Home About Privacy Contact us Disclaimer Site Map Advertise

Site Meter

International Foreign and Caribbean medical schools,
ValueMD provides information on medical education from premed to residency