AAIMG fraud - Page 11

azskeptic · #**101** (**permalink**) 08-14-2006, 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by schoolagain

You are kidding right? Repeatedly you have stated yourself that you have spoken with the owners, president of AAIMG. You knew and continued your rampage. Now everyone sees who you are. If you have so much information, you are not silenced by law. Please redeem yourself and state what you know or how you were invovled. That is the biggest cop-out I have heard yet from you. I hope everyone E mails Doc and please let him see the double standard you have created. You knew the president of Saba was the owner of AAIMG,,,,and you repeatedly reinforced AAIMG's mission, knowing that it was one school slandering another. That is low...and now everyone knows Skeptic

Again, I will await the court trial. I have spoken to attorneys for both litigates and the fair thing to do is await the trial. I was NOT involved for either side and will not speak about this until it is in the correct venue. I don't know the facts, it turns out, so like the rest of you will await to see what developes.

dr2004usa · #**102** (**permalink**) 08-14-2006, 04:03 PM

well, the student body knows that he dated the reports from like oct. 2005 and put pictures from as early as jan 2005 and from 2006. his site visit was completely false and made up, especially the interview with 60 + students.... all completely ** with some particular hidden agenda.. i got some finals to worry about, so i'll leave it like that

blythplace · #**103** (**permalink**) 08-14-2006, 04:09 PM

Ok so until the court case comes up and you supposedly "disspell" all these rumors- wouldn't it be wise for you to be temporarily not a moderator on here?
Once you're shown to be free of knowing what had went down- then maybe you should be allowed to be a mod. But the fact that there's quotes from you stating you know more than the rest of us on vmd- and then you going on to advocate that organization despite knowing "more than the rest of vmd" clearly brings a lot of questions up when specifics about that organization have been made public. Not to mention the fact that you admit you aided them in opening up while still keeping things quiet for the most part should be reason enough for you to temporarily give up your mod rights until everything- including your role in all of this is brought to light.You own the organization's website- come on- you're saying we should all just let that go as coincidence? Whatever it is- i wish the vmd admin (doc) would address this issue rather than just sweeping it under the rug.

blythplace · #**104** (**permalink**) 08-14-2006, 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dr2004usa

well, the student body knows that he dated the reports from like oct. 2005 and put pictures from as early as jan 2005 and from 2006. his site visit was completely false and made up, especially the interview with 60 + students.... all completely ** with some particular hidden agenda.. i got some finals to worry about, so i'll leave it like that

Once again-- i hope vmd admin (doc) addresses all this. I agree with some of the other students stating that he shouldn't be allowed to be a mod after all this- at the very least he temporarily should give that position up until everything comes to light and the public finds out more about his take on it. For now we're expected to "not judge him" but at the same time he's allowed to say he has no statement and STILL keep his mod status?

He hasn't even said he didn't know about all this- would saying that he didnt know about this connection ever cause a negative backlash in court if that were the case?

azskeptic · #**105** (**permalink**) 08-14-2006, 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blythplace

Ok so until the court case comes up and you supposedly "disspell" all these rumors- wouldn't it be wise for you to be temporarily not a moderator on here?
Once you're shown to be free of knowing what had went down- then maybe you should be allowed to be a mod. But the fact that there's quotes from you stating you know more than the rest of us on vmd- and then you going on to advocate that organization despite knowing "more than the rest of vmd" clearly brings a lot of questions up when specifics about that organization have been made public. Not to mention the fact that you admit you aided them in opening up while still keeping things quiet for the most part should be reason enough for you to temporarily give up your mod rights until everything- including your role in all of this is brought to light.You own the organization's website- come on- you're saying we should all just let that go as coincidence? Whatever it is- i wish the vmd admin (doc) would address this issue rather than just sweeping it under the rug.

I have no intention of leaving vmd and serve as a moderator at Doc's discretion. That you don't like what I do is best served by taking it up with Doc. Your biases are well known.

blythplace · #**106** (**permalink**) 08-14-2006, 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by azskeptic

I have no intention of leaving vmd and serve as a moderator at Doc's discretion. That you don't like what I do is best served by taking it up with Doc. Your biases are well known.

My bias is one thing. I'm not the one trying to have the bias AND be a supposed "neutral" mod that's looking out for everyone.

schoolagain · #**107** (**permalink**) 08-14-2006, 04:16 PM

Ohhhhh. that is fresh...calling him bias...I am falling off my chair laughing. I think you don't want to incriminate yourself any further, because allegations are still being levied and you could very well find yourself with a law suit slapped against you!!Oh wait...has that already happened?

2fasfasligand · #**108** (**permalink**) 08-14-2006, 04:21 PM

Azkeptic should resign the moderator position atleast until the court case is over. It does not help us to have a moderator who cannot speak due to legal reasons.

AUCMD2006 · #**109** (**permalink**) 08-14-2006, 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmericanIMG

there should be a specific standard to give accreditation, not just a site visit and then opinion. one set of visitors will have different opinions then others, etc.

i would love to see this link to the case and the appeal as well.

the application contains things that they look for such as stability, research, faculty turnover, curricul hours.content, basic science and clinical transition, finances, clinical afffiliation agreements, and so on. the site visit checks on the school, the curricula interviews staff and students, then also visits and evaluates the clinical sites and how the profs there grade, reqs there etc.

you are making it out like its a one page application then they send some random doc, nuirse, and lawyer to stroll through campus and give an opinion. read the SMU report to see what things they look at if you have time

AmericanIMG · #**110** (**permalink**) 08-14-2006, 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rdecastro

Because I am not going to go to a school where I'm treated like a child. I am old enough to decide what I will wear (and be the father of most of my classmates), and if there are people who wear more expensive clothing than I do, good for them - I really don't care. I can probably dress (at home) in better, more expensive clothing than the rags they pick out of GQ or Maxim, the least expensive business suit I own cost me $1900 (and it's off the rack).

I will not be insulted by some gutless wonder administrator, or conform to their concept of uniformity. Especially when it's such a pathetic attempt: If they said that I had to wear dress slacks, and a shirt and tie under a white coat every day, I might tolerate it. Scrubs everyday? OK, I guess (but still, silly) - the pathetic costume they specified is something I will not tolerate.

I wore a uniform for 26 years in the Air Force, it served a valid purpose there. I also worked for IBM, where there was a corporate dress code, and I accepted employment in both knowing what the dress requirements were. At what is supposed to be a professional school for adults, it doesn't serve any valid purpose. And any school that has such a policy is one that I would not be happy at.

However, civilization and free choice are wonderful things, and those who don't mind being 'Nannied' can go and be told what to do.

so what was the difference in IBM making you wear a dress code and SMU? were you not an adult at IBM? every school on the island of Cayman requires a specific dress code, and on the island there are many xpats. the SMU dress code seperates you from a common tourist.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
medicine and politics	VTACH	The Relaxing Lounge	6	07-25-2004 06:59 PM