Residency is not about words of encouragement or the random outliers, it should be based on factual information. NRMP charting outcomes are factual information.They are not opinions. It is the statistics. If you actually don't waste time getting opinions and instead look at the 140 pg PDF file for 2007 you will see for yourself that there are individuals that have matched with "poor" scores in competitive specialities. But not everything is black & White. Sometimes these individuals with poor scores, have stellar recommendations, or research and publications, or even connections. Take a look at your step score, in combination with your CV & Clinical and pre-clinical grades, and you decide if you fit in the categories of the individuals matched. This will give you a more realistic idea of your chances. Saying that, if you actually READ the file you will see that one of the top 5 specialities that IMGS match in is OBGYN. I urge people to READ and stop seeking random peoples opinions
Basic Sciences [x] Step 1 [x]ob gyn [x] family med [x]
internal medicine[x]surgery [ ] peds [ ] psych [ ]
step 2 ck [ ] electives [ ] step 2 cs[ ] ERAS [ ] Match [ ]