AAIMG law suit in Nevada

[Miklos]

Originally Posted by bts4202

I would imagine that if the corp. has been passed on to azskeptic, then he would become liable now. I am not sure about the legal stuff, I am not a lawyer. It seems logical though.

Its like if I sued pepsi co for something and they just switched ceo's, my case would still be valid and the new ceo would have to deal with it. Likewise, i would imagine that pepsi co could not just pick up and move to another state and avoid liability.

Does anyone know more details of the law surrounding this kind of situation?

If someone buys (or otherwise acquires) a corporation, then yes, one would be legally liable. However, az has said that this is not the case.

He does not own the corporation that put up the website. He merely holds the registration rights for the website (which are a commodity, much like a car or a case of pepsi), which were given to him by the corporation's owners. Therefore, he is not liable for the corporation's past actions.

[bts4202]

Originally Posted by Miklos

If someone buys (or otherwise acquires) a corporation, then yes, one would be legally liable. However, az has said that this is not the case.

He does not own the corporation that put up the website. He merely holds the registration rights for the website (which are a commodity, much like a car or a case of pepsi), which were given to him by the corporation's owners. Therefore, he is not liable for the corporation's past actions.

for his sake, I certainly hope that is true. I guess we will all find out when the court date arrives and we see who is there.

[LJG]

Originally Posted by azskeptic

St. Mxxxxxxx University v. Association of American International Medical Graduates, pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada (Southern Division), Case No. CV-S-05-0848-RCJ(LRL).

What are they claiming and have any individuals been named????

[Miklos]

Originally Posted by bts4202

for his sake, I certainly hope that is true. I guess we will all find out when the court date arrives and we see who is there.

https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices...?CorpID=353514

[azskeptic]

Originally Posted by bts4202

I would imagine that if the corp. has been passed on to azskeptic, then he would become liable now. I am not sure about the legal stuff, I am not a lawyer. It seems logical though.

Its like if I sued pepsi co for something and they just switched ceo's, my case would still be valid and the new ceo would have to deal with it. Likewise, i would imagine that pepsi co could not just pick up and move to another state and avoid liability.

Does anyone know more details of the law surrounding this kind of situation?

You are correct...if someone takes a corporation and there are liabilities they assume the liabilities.......but read my post again...the corporation wasn't given to anyone and it apparently was allowed to die.

[Genossa maximillian]

and most people here know I butt heads with him now and then, AAIMG as a corporation is non-existent, the case is moot. AAIMG is simply a domain name and domanin names are not liable per se.

Once a judge orders a hearing and figures this out he or she will most likely dismiss the case, no brainer.

Originally Posted by azskeptic

You are correct...if someone takes a corporation and there are liabilities they assume the liabilities.......but read my post again...the corporation wasn't given to anyone and it apparently was allowed to die.

[azskeptic]

Originally Posted by LJG

What are they claiming and have any individuals been named????

No one except the court and the petitioner know what the suit is about: it is sealed. If anyone can get the information legally let the rest of us know what it is about; I am curious but it isn't my case.

[azskeptic]

Originally Posted by bts4202

for his sake, I certainly hope that is true. I guess we will all find out when the court date arrives and we see who is there.

When is the court date?

[LJG]

Originally Posted by azskeptic

No one except the court and the petitioner know what the suit is about: it is sealed. If anyone can get the information legally let the rest of us know what it is about; I am curious but it isn't my case.

It's not sealed, and two individuals have been named in the suit. Can you guess who (or what schools they own)????????

[bts4202]

Originally Posted by LJG

It's not sealed, and two individuals have been named in the suit. Can you guess who (or what schools they own)????????

Do you have any link or anything to show who was named?