State of Oregon lists AAIMG as fraudulent...

[Freddie Fillmore]

http://www.osac.state.or.us/oda/accreditation.html

[Japhethi]

The people that created the AAIMG in order to further their own schools or whatever they did it for, need to be held responsible.

I am currently encouraging every school out there that have been put in a bad light by these frauds to take legal action. It is the AAIMG that will have to prove all their accusations in court and not the other way.

Also, by filing a civil, and not a criminal suit (filing for slandering and not fraud) the burden of proof is definately on the AAIMG and not the other way around.

This scumbag have to be exposed once and for all, it is time he&she will have to pay BADLY for sneaky marketing strategies.

Again, school administrators, go and get them...

I am really looking forward to see some blood here

[Japhethi]

The US dept. of education, ultimately repsonsible for all accreditation should be told to step up to the plate and defend their authority. Rogue bodies like this, with their own selfish agendas have no place in granting any sense of creibility, especially not with regard to graduate education.

Someone with more legal depth should encourage a federal accusation of falsifying information here..

It could be fun to see Mr Thomas Moore doing some hard time here. About time he learns that crookery doesn't pay off in the long run

These schools have been found to "exceed AAIMG's criterias":
(in order of ranking on their site)

1. St. Georges School of Medicine,

2. Saba University School of Medicine,

3. American University of the Caribbean

4. Ross University School of Medicine

5. *Medical University of the Americas



All the remaining schools are in Mexico or the Dominican Republic

6. Universidad Iberoamerica

7. Instituto Technologica De Santo Domingo

8. Universidad Autonoma de Guadalajara

9. Universidad Autonoma de Ciudad Juarez

10. Universidad De Monterrey

11. Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey

12. Universidad de Montemorelos



*This is what the AAIMG said about Medical University of the Americas:

"Of 9 new schools to open in the Caribbean and Central America since 1997,
this is the only school with a permanent, suitable physical facility,
adequate staffing and developed clerkships".

A few questions here.


*What happened to these schools??

University of West Indies
University of St. Eustatius
University of Guyana

(I mean, haven't these schools gotten permanent faculty, "suitable physical faculty", and "developed clerkships"?


*What about all the other Caribbean schools that are around here?? I meet students from many other schools all
the time in rotations. Aren't their clerkships "developed"??

*Have anyone EVER met any people from AAIMG in their "official function"? Three different episodes of visits to all
Caribbean schools should have left SOME traces..

*I have yet to hear anyone from UVI, St. Eustatius or Univ Guyana that haven't gotten into residencies.
Does the AAIMG know soemthing US residency programs don't??



Whether schools are intimidated by the AAIMG, despite an overwhealming pattern of lies, or if they simply have chosen to ignore the whole thing is an interesting question. Well, ignorance can be bliss, but also the path to doom if the bully doesn't stop beating on you. If they don't
start standing up to these accusations, I am afraid new customers will keep believing Mr Moores lies.



AzSkeptic, why don't you open the ball here and contact the DOE??
Would LOVE them to get involved in the realities of the AAIMG and who's behind. That would be a "Cold hard truth" to someone.

[stephew]

Originally Posted by Freddie Fillmore

http://www.osac.state.or.us/oda/accreditation.html

hardly worth a and more worth a .
ITs ollllld news.
See:
http://www.valuemd.com/viewtopic.php?t=10425&start=0

http://www.valuemd.com/viewtopic.php?t=14082&start=0
and search aaimg ad nausum. The is that people still take it seriously.

[dt]

You're so jaded...

[Japhethi]

I find it AMAZING that moderators on this forum try to label genuine concerns and opinions people have as being "ad Nauseum".

Mr Filmore came with factual information after several people have addressed the same concerns before. He have fronted these facts with full name and given credible information of sources. Instead of mocking his research, moderators on a forum like this should take a backbench and let him air his opinion on this, unless what he is saying is false information or perosnal insults. I see nothing of neither in MR Filmores Post.


You can keep mocking people that complain about this, but remember every time you do so, whether it is because it "messes up the threads", or is "repeated ad Nauseum" it makes YOU more likely to encounter the same degree of mockery.

I am sure we could extend a line here and grant anyone that complains of injustice of repeating facts "ad Nauseum", including:

*Jews in Germany in the 30's/40's
*Martim Luther King
*Wrongly convicted death row inmates..

They all took their issues seriously, and THANK GOD for that...

Mr Moore is struggling nowadays, Does me listing Mr Moore grant me a warning now?? Oh, I forgot that, there IS no Mr Moore, is it... So I guess it will be hard to warn me for slandering a fictious person, won't it??

[studentMD]

Freddie, i mean Mr. Fillmore, how are Lucy and Ricky Ricardo doin ?? lol

[stephew]

Originally Posted by Japhethi

You can keep mocking people that complain about this, but remember every time you do so, whether it is because it "messes up the threads", or is "repeated ad Nauseum" it makes YOU more likely to encounter the same degree of mockery.

I am sure we could extend a line here and grant anyone that complains of injustice of repeating facts "ad Nauseum", including:

*Jews in Germany in the 30's/40's
*Martim Luther King
*Wrongly convicted death row inmates..

They all took their issues seriously, and THANK GOD for that...

Youve willfully chosen to never understood why you've received a warning in spite of more than one person explaining it to you. That's one issue and frankly, yours alone. And Im sure you can extend a line on anything, no question. I am not mocking the original poster; if s/he thinks that then I'm happy to make that clear. I'm merely amazed that AAIMG hasn't lost all crediblility yet and people are surprised to hear they are under a shadow. As for directing a person to prior threads that can elucide a topic that gets re-posted...and responded to in length each month, you're going to have to cope with that. That you have such an agenda with regard to AAIMG and have a hard time resisting discussing it at every available opportunity doesnt mean that starting over at the beginning each time someone new inquires about it is the best or most appropriate way to handle it (and the same thing with all your completely relevant examples above by the way). It has also seemed to have blinded you to the fact that I've agreed with the basic notion of the validity (or lack there of) of AAIMG. As for potential mockery issue.. "hello kettle?"

[stephew]

Originally Posted by dt

You're so jaded...

Oh don't i know it. Dealing with the AAIMG will do that to you.

[Japhethi]

How long time did it take everybody in the US to get the right to vote?

How long time did it take a woman to have the right to abortion?

How long time did it take for freedom of speech to evolve in Russia?

How long time did it take to create laws against racial discrimination?

I can go on an go on, but it doesn't seem to sink in. You are trying to dodge the topic by saying the issue have been addressed before. HELLO!!

Like you say "That you have such an agenda with regard to AAIMG and have a hard time resisting discussing it at every available opportunity doesnt mean that starting over at the beginning each time someone new inquires about it is the best or most appropriate way to handle it"...

replace AAIMG with racial discrimination/sexual harrassment/housing discrimination and let's see how far such a saying goes in America of 2004!

As long as "Thomas Moore" is not standing up and defending/explaining his "acreditations", do you really expect this topic to stay silent? Would be nice to know if you know whether you are in America or in the old Sovjet Union.!

Do you think ignoring the message will solve the problem?