Premier ReviewsValueMD Sponsor
Home Forum Books Links Album Residency USMLE PreMed


Caribbean Medical Schools European Medical Schools Foreign Medical Schools Medical Resources
Go Back   ValueMD Medical Schools Forum > USMLE FORUMS > USMLE STEP 1 > Behavioral Science Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2005, 06:02 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 539
Ethical Issue, decision

Q- A schizophrenic outpatient comes to visit his doctor to ask for advice. He states that he has been experiencing many negative side effects from the Haloperidol he is taking. He is experiencing tardive dyskinesia. He asks his doctor if it would be all right if he entered a double blind study on the effects of a new schizophrenic drug. One group would not receive any treatment and the other group would receive the experimental drug. What would you say to this patient?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2005, 06:06 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 539
Rp

The study would be too risky considering his current condition. Look at alternative drugs with less side effects until the new drug has been tested.

The patient is a schizophrenic and cannot risk not taking his medicine while on the study because he doesn’t know if he would be placed in the group with medicine or the group without. Therefore as a physician, one needs to be aware of that risk.

In addition, according to medical rules, the patient who is incompetent or who is psychotic and dysfunctional as is this patient, has the right to refuse a medical treatment but it must be through a surrogate.
When a surrogate makes decisions for a patient, they should use the following criteria:
a) Subjective standard-actual intent, advance directive
b) Substitutive judgment- who best represents the patient
c) Best interest standard-burdens vs. benefits and interests of patient, not preferences of the decision-maker

The patient is not considered competent and therefore cannot make the best decision.
In addition, the patient is upset about the side effects. Therefore, it should not be forced on him if he does not like the side effects, because this will also lead to a risky response due to his aversion of the side effects (he may not take the medicine as often as he should).

A physician should not advise a patient to go into a medically threatening situation, especially a double blind study in which neither the investigators nor the patient know if he is getting any treatment.

A participant of a double blind study must sign a form of consent stating that they will not take any medicine while on the study and they accept the responsibility of their decision.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2003-2008 ValueMD, LLC. All rights reserved.
Home About Privacy Contact us Disclaimer Site Map Advertise

Site Meter

International Foreign and Caribbean medical schools,
ValueMD provides information on medical education from premed to residency