There is no evidence of a school effect on USMLE scores. That is, there is no evidence that, after adjusting for other predictors (gpa, MCAT), that the choice of school has an effect on USMLE scores. If you believe the data (which is often questionable), there are differences in pass rates; however, it is not clear whether the differences in pass rate are due to differences in quality of education or to differences in the quality of students. For example, SGU has a higher pass rate than the other schools; however, it is also the most selective so you would expect SGU to have the highest pass rate. Thus, it is hard to say whether the difference is due to nature (quality of students), nuture (quality of education) or both.
Statistically, one would test the existence of a school effect with the following model:
USMLE = b0 + b1*MCAT + b2*GPA + b3*school + e
and test whether the regression coefficient, b3, is statistically significant. The variable, school, would be an indicator variable that takes a value of zero or 1 depending on whether one attends one school (say, SGU) vs. all the others. The value of b3 would give you the increment in USMLE score that would be obtained by attending SGU after adjustment for the
known predictors, MCAT and gpa. Because MCAT and gpa are known predictors that vary by school, it is meaningless to make school by school comparisons of USMLE stats without accounting for these factors.
Still, in the absense of data, it is interesting to speculate whether there is any reason why a school effect might exist. In my opinion, there is little reason to think a school effect exists because the educational programs at all the carib schools are very similar. They all have a discipline based curriculum that is delivered by lecture. They all use the same standard texts. Thus, I find it hard to believe that the minor differences in educational experience would account for significant differences in USMLE scores between schools. On the other hand, we know that the school vary in selectivity which we
know has an impact on USMLE scores irrespective of school.
That said, I would not go as far to say that all schools are alike. Thus, I would say that is probably worth the extra money to go to a CA approved school if you have the opportunity. For one, you will have a wider range of options for residency and practice that may prove quite valuable. Also, there is risk associated with smaller schools. You can avoid this by going to a proven school with an established history of placing students in residency. The established schools have much better networks of clinical sites that can save you time, money and headaches. Thus, it may be penny wise and pound foolish to attend a fledgling school.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nshams
well, new question then: how much does a school affect someone for USMLE prep?
I just don't feel like a basic sciences program can teach me anything that I can't open up a book & read about ...
Far as I can tell, clinicals all happen in the US & I don't really know how big of a difference there can be between AUC US clinical site & St James US clinical site (anyone can clarify?)
Big difference is in AUC's reputation. I'm trying to weigh how much I give up in terms of those connections if I end up @ St James (AUC might reject me & I don't want to deal with the whole application cycle again).
|