wow, that is quite a compelling argument. i honestly don't know which country would provide a student better clinical training. i have heard, in fact, that the training in mexico is much more involved due to the lack of constricting laws and hospital regulations such as hippa.
all this is to say, i am not convinced that i would receive better training in the US. i do, however, greatly appreciate your insightlful candor. you have given me a lot to consider...
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrendaB_MD
I believe you will forgo U.S. clinical experience (USCE) which will put you at a disadvantage relative to carib grads who have USCE, LOR from US physicians. Many programs have a requirement for USCE and US letters. I think you will still get a residency if you go to UAG but you will probably have more options if you go to SGU. I agree with the other posters that location should generally be a secondary factor in medical school selection. I don't think selecting UAG would be a disaster or prevent you from getting a residency; however, you will be a stronger candidate if you get USCE, etc.
I think there is an ethical angle as well. As a future doctor, you have a responsibility to obtain the best training you can. Ask yourself, "Would my future patients benefit more if I got clinical training in Mexico or the US?"
|