Uh oh. How could the examiners provide quantitative data to prove that their answers were 'good', 'bad' or 'excellent'? I mean wouldn't the markings be subjective? Do they record these oral exams using dictaphones or something?

I'm sure a well-established institution such as Charles uni doesn't approve favouritism or allow secretly bribing examiners just to pass them but how could someone be sure that these kind of things don't happen?

Are the verbal exams held one-on-one with the examiner or should you recite them in front of your classmates in a lecture hall? What are the procedures like? Thanks