I don't think you understand the elements of proof. If someone says "CMU is a fraud" without providing evidence themselves this doesn't mean they don't have it and that they're making a baseless accusation. It may just mean that the proof of this has been offered up again and again and certain people like to pretend that they haven't seen it. As far as CMU is concerned there is no charter or accreditation and for 4 months various cheerleaders have been promising it will be in tomorrow or two weeks or two months and each of these promised dates have come and gone and no charter has come into being. Enough questions have been raised about this school by now that someone needs to provide positive proof yet everytime RL offers "proof" it is badly flawed and when you look more closely "proves" nothing. The only reason I ask about you Steph is that you seem to spend most of your time running defense for RL. If you're not being paid by him then your conduct is even more incomprehensible. It's true there are courts and police but there is also a free press, the valuemd forum, and public opinion. If there are questions about the validity of this school there is no place it belongs more than here where aspiring doctors and potential students can hear all the facts and judge for themselves. Trouble is some people are scared of them hearing all the facts.
As far as the courts are concerned it may well be that certain fraudsters will see those birght lights soon enough. No reason to jump the gun. So don't keep saying this belongs in the courts or the police station. That may come soon enough.