Quote:
Originally Posted by evilsax
Well I'm just giving you the information. These internet searches are pretty accurate-what do you think the police use? If anyone wants to look at the facts fine. If you want to ignore it that's your right too. But this is public information and there's no law against posting it. I will pursue every avenue opened to me to get to the bottom of this including the police. I've spoken with them. ***** ********* has refused to cooperate with me and is ducking my emails. I'm also letting people who attend CMU or St. James know what the public records say. And that is my right.
|
1) The problem with internet research is that engine contain a large amount of data and it is impossible for companies to update ever thing. Even if they have enough man power to do it, they would probably spend those hours updating information that bring in the profit (shopping sites). Yes, it is good that you used three engines for cross reference, but the the problem is that those three engines are using the exact same pool of data as their source of data.
2) It is okay to report what you found. If you simply just report that you used the reverse phone directory for cmu's chicago's cmu office number and directory showed an address that is stated on the cmu website, then you are completely by your freedom of speech. However, you can not call cmu's chicago office a fake without doing further research. What kind of evidence can you show that prove cmu's chicago office is fake? Currently, there are two posters in vauemd have already testified that they have been to the chicago office and they know that office does exist.
3) Sax, the reverse phone look up thing is old news and it has been discussed over and over again. I just do not see the point of starting another thread over it.