Amigoe published a few months ago positive articles about CMU.
They have the reputation of being unbiased and independent.

Remember when the Washington Post was vilipended and qualified as a gossip column when it published the first article about the Watergate?
It all turned out to be true and the journalists got a Pulitzer prize!

They were not impressed when RL threaten them with a lawsuit if they did not remove the English article from their website.

In that same article RL’s lawyer qualifies VMD as " a gossip website with an obscure character without any scientific value and not controlled by a government (sic)".
Apparently RL's lawyer is unaware that his client has used and misused the VMD forum with more than 400 posts!!!

So let us not deviate from the essential and try to blame RL's long track of dishonesty (plagiarism, lies about being accredited, false promises, etc) on alleged gutter journalism.

"the dogs are barking, but the caravan is passing by..." the Prophet Mohammed.