Quote:
Originally Posted by Genossa maximillian
You post it like if it made it to Britanica Encyclopaedia but it happened with St. Chris too. As much as the information is accurate, we do know that Wikipedia is not an acceptable source of reference for most ACCREDITED U.S. educational institutions, see the irony of whoever post it? Remember the little scandal with WIKI? A moderator that was fired because he pretended to be a PhD and turned out to be a 2nd year college dropout?
We are beating on the same thing over and over folks, we know what the Inspector General said, that they have no license or charter but are working on getting one. (thats what he said, once they get it , then the argument will shift towards something else I am sure) We are simply walking in circles here.
|
my question is...why does it BUG you so much that people post here- even if it is "beating a dead horse" as you say.
Personally i didn't think posting that CMU was in Wikipedia was beating that poor horse- i didn't know about it- so it was somewhat informative.
I don't understand why you think your posting of your email form the inspector general is the last word on this issue.
if reading these posts upsets you so much...don't read them....