Thread: Charter Issues
View Single Post
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2007, 10:02 AM
MYMD MYMD is offline
Elite Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Scut Monkey: Clinicals
Posts: 1,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Genossa maximillian View Post
I remember AUA and the twinning program and the DOE, even I argued with Sree about it.

I do know the Oregon guy hangs around silently on these forums. I am not very fond to the way he does business, Oregon tends to use anything posted in any sort of media to list a school in their site, but when you have a lay person running things, you can't make 100% of the people happy. At least California and New York has a system implemented site visits, etc. Oregon is a different ball game (I am not saying they don't do a good job, but sometimes they cross the line), all bets are off with them. Different subject anyway.

How about Xavier? Do you remember their status? Didn't they had more or less the same issues in the beginning with their charter because they were not IMED listed or was it for WHO? I can't remember very well.

Max
I have a lot of open questions as well, since they have 3 schools now on different islands the Charter issue has never been really clear, yet not one of these posters seem to be on the X forum ripping into the inconsistencies there,

There are numerous other schools, I think the Big reason there are these people are two fold

One, RL answering
Two, some may not be who the seem to be.

No defense of CMU of course, they should be scrutinized as any other school. But it does seem to be a crusade going on, and there will be students attending this school while it is in existence, I see the internet Basic Sci schools are still open and running normal too........
__________________
As a student on Value MD not attending one of the Covenanted schools there is no pleasure in posting anymore.