An opinion, not legal advice.

• Well, if my son/daughter went to a school that held itself out as something that as the events have unfolded leads to dubious conclusions, I would initiate a criminal suit against all of the prinicipals, management and shareholders of each and every corporation. Questions on my mind as a parent would be: (i) Was this school aware of the internal problems and when did the awareness develop. In this mental exercise example, the shareholders knew that none of the parties involved would be able to reach an agreement, instead as it would appear, each side pulled and pulled until the "sheet" was ripped into pieces.
• The College was able to generate income of over $30 million U.S. dollars according to certain documentation that might be related to a former school in England. It might be reasonable to commence a hypothesis/speculation that the potential shareholders or the probable beneficiaries of the alleged profits from the $30 million U.S., over the 26 month period was probably heathly, thus, it might have allowed them/they/he/she/it to buy a Mercedes or four or some other nice properties. But who knows, right?
• It was written elsewhere that maybe a DC-3 or someother aircraft was purchased and it seems like a familiar name was mentioned in connection with that transaction. Maybe the E.R. doc was going to train as a pilot.
• Lets just pretend here for a second that you meet an idividual that holds himself out to be something other than he or she really is, and this influences you to make a decision that you otherwise might not have......we have the building blocks of a nasty word called fraud. Not fraud yet, I think, I mean I see it in the movies all the time, but at least it's something to look at, while watching reruns of J.A.G.

__________________

The W.H.O. does not recognize, nor do they accredit.

The ECFMG does not recognize, nor do they accredit.